FPSing

Solo ARC Raiders: how to decide what a loadout is actually worth

Running solo changes the maths on every item you bring down. A framework for valuing a loadout by what it costs you to lose it, why the expensive kit often performs worse alone, and where to look up the current item data.

FPSing Editorial Team

Editorial desk

Published
Reading time
5 min read

Most loadout advice for extraction shooters answers the wrong question. It answers what is the best gear, when the question that actually decides whether you make progress is what can I afford to lose today.

Running ARC Raiders solo sharpens that difference considerably. You have no one to trade shots with, no one to pick you up, and no second bag coming out if yours does not. Every item you bring down is an item you are individually responsible for extracting.

The only loadout question that matters solo#

Before you take anything down, answer this:

If I lose everything on this run, can I immediately run again at the same standard?

If the answer is no, the loadout is too expensive. Not "risky" — too expensive, in the specific sense that a single bad encounter takes you out of the game while you rebuild.

This is a different failure mode from dying. Dying is fine; it is the expected outcome of a meaningful share of runs. The failure mode to avoid is dying in a way that changes what you are able to do next. A run that costs you an hour of rebuilding was a worse run than three cheap deaths in a row.

Replacement cost, not power#

Rank your kit by what it costs to replace, not by its stats. In practice these two orderings diverge more than you would expect, because the most expensive items are frequently the ones gated behind materials that are annoying to farm rather than the ones that are strongest in a fight.

A useful habit: before a run, look at each item and put it in one of three buckets.

  • Free — you have several spare, or it is trivially recraftable. Bring it without thinking.
  • Replaceable — one run's worth of effort to get back. Bring it if the objective needs it.
  • Painful — you would notice losing it for hours. Leave it in storage unless this specific run is the reason you have been saving it.

The mistake almost every solo player makes is filling a bag with painful items because they were available, then playing so cautiously to protect them that the run accomplishes nothing.

Why expensive kit often performs worse alone#

There is a behavioural cost to carrying valuable gear that has nothing to do with its stats.

When you know your loadout is expensive, you take fewer fights, hold longer angles, avoid contested loot, and extract earlier. Individually those are all reasonable decisions. Together they mean you spent a run avoiding the parts of the game that generate value.

Cheap kit plays more aggressively because it can afford to, and aggressive solo play is frequently safer in an extraction shooter than passive solo play. Sitting still on a surface where other raiders and machines are both actively moving is not a low-risk strategy — it just feels like one.

The counterexample#

There is a real case for bringing expensive kit solo: when you have a specific objective that genuinely requires it, and you have accepted the cost in advance.

That is a different decision, made deliberately. The problem is not expensive loadouts. It is expensive loadouts brought by default.

Building the run around the objective#

Solo runs work best when they have exactly one objective. Decide it before you drop, and let it determine the loadout rather than the other way around.

Three common shapes:

Material run. You need specific components. Bring maximum bag space, minimum combat investment, and plan an extraction you can reach without crossing contested ground. Success is measured in what you carried out, not in fights won.

Quest run. You need to reach a location or complete an objective. Bring exactly what the objective demands plus a way out. Everything else is a distraction — and if you are unsure what a step actually requires before you commit to it, check the quest record first rather than discovering it on the surface.

Contest run. You are deliberately going somewhere valuable that other raiders also want. This is the only shape where expensive kit is straightforwardly correct, because you have accepted that fighting is the point.

Mixing these is where solo runs go wrong. A material run that turns into a contest run because you saw an opportunity usually ends with neither objective completed.

Practical rules that hold up#

A short list we would give any solo raider:

  • Bring one fewer weapon than you think you need, and the bag space instead.
  • Always carry your exit. Whatever consumable or route gets you off the surface, that is not the thing to skimp on.
  • Decide your extraction before you fight, not after. A fight you win a long way from any exit is frequently a fight you lose on the walk back.
  • Machines are not always the enemy. Leaving an ARC patrol alive and intact is often better than clearing it — noise is what brings other raiders, and a fight you did not start costs nothing.
  • Leave when the bag is worth more than the next room. This is the discipline that separates players who accumulate from players who plateau.

That last one is the hardest, and it is the one that most reliably distinguishes a solo player who is making progress from one who is running in circles.

Where to check the numbers#

This guide is about judgement, and judgement does not go out of date. The specific numbers do — item stats, recipe costs, quest requirements and trader inventories all change as the game is updated, and we are not going to reprint them here where they would quietly go stale.

For the current data — item and recipe records, quest requirements, trader stock, surface maps with grid coordinates, and a loadout planner you can build against — use Raiderism. It tracks the live game data properly, which is exactly the job this article is not trying to do.

Bring the framework here. Get the numbers there.

Sources

Found something wrong or out of date? Tell us — we correct errors in place and label material changes. Read our editorial standards.

About the author

The FPSing reticle monogram, used as the editorial team profile mark

FPSing Editorial Team

Editorial desk

The shared byline for articles researched, written and reviewed by the FPSing editorial operation.

CoversFPS fundamentals and training · Extraction shooter strategy · Patch and update analysis · Loadout and build reasoning · Beginner onboarding

Disclosure +

FPSing is operated by the same ownership group as Raiderism and CODZombie, which are linked from articles where they are genuinely the better destination for reference data. FPSing does not accept payment for coverage, and no article on this site is sponsored. If affiliate or commercial arrangements are introduced, they will be disclosed on the article and on the affiliate disclosure page before any such link appears.

Spotted an error? Report a correction or email corrections@fpsing.com.